But through this, ADF itself has held a low profile, even being an occasional outsider in the evangelical political movement. Millions of Americans have heard of ADF’s biggest case: a dispute over a wedding cake that will go before the Supreme Court on Tuesday. Taking reins of the 24-year-old group, which now has a staff of 250 and a $59 million budget, is the opportunity of his lifetime, said Farris, a constitutional lawyer with a hairdo befitting a 1970s newscaster.ĪDF has spent years cultivating high-profile religious freedom bills in statehouses while slogging through courts, particularly defending Christian shopkeepers who refused service for same-sex weddings. It was a hot February afternoon, and Farris, wearing a slightly-too-large gray suit, had been named CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom four weeks earlier. “Father, thank you so much for this beautiful day and providing for our needs,” he said above the chicken-and-steak lunch special.
#Arizona based alliance defending dom free
As a result, Sharing Down Syndrome has unique interests to defend and information to supply to this Court in this litigation.”Īlliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, parental rights, and the sanctity of life.The same hour Jeff Sessions was sworn in as the nation’s 84th US attorney general in Washington, DC, Mike Farris was at a strip mall in Scottsdale, Arizona, bowing his head over a sizzling platter of fajitas.
“Plaintiffs’ success in ensuring that babies with Down syndrome are stripped of legal protections against discrimination will also inhibit Sharing Down Syndrome’s ability to reach, educate, and support children and families experiencing Down syndrome.
“If Plaintiffs are successful, children with Down syndrome are likely to continue to be discriminatorily aborted based on the genetic abnormalities with which they are diagnosed,” the motion continues. “These protections can help ensure that children diagnosed with Down syndrome receive the same right to life and chance to grow and develop as babies without diagnosed genetic abnormalities.” District Court for the District of Arizona explains. “The legal challenge filed by the Plaintiffs in this matter directly implicates Sharing Down Syndrome’s interests because it seeks to block crucial new legal protections for those with Down syndrome,” the motion filed in the U.S. Since 2011, the state of Arizona has prohibited persons from “perform an abortion knowing that the abortion is sought based on the sex or race of the child or the race of a parent of that child.” In 2021, Arizona added to its ban on discriminatory abortions based on sex and race by including a prohibition against discriminatory abortions based on genetic abnormalities, such as Down syndrome. Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona has a direct interest in seeing that they do not succeed with such an inhumane plan.” While it should be common sense to support such a law, abortionists and others with a vested interest in seeing such abortions continue have sued to tear it down.
“Among other things, Senate Bill 1457 ensures that babies, including those with Down syndrome, are not targeted for death because of their genetic makeup. “Every unborn life is valuable, precious, and worthy of protection,” said ADF Senior Counsel Denise Burke. Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona is asking the court to allow it to enter the case so that it can help defend the law. Brnovich, seeking to have SB 1457, the law containing those protections, struck down. Two abortionists and three organizations who oppose the protections for Down syndrome babies filed a l awsuit, Isaacson v. PHOENIX – Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing a nonprofit organization that assists and provides support to children and families experiencing Down syndrome filed a motion in federal court Wednesday that asks it to let the group intervene in defense of Arizona’s law that prevents babies from being aborted for having the disability.
0 kommentar(er)
